Barriers to Entry to the Big Firm Audit Market: Evidence From Market Reaction to Switches to Second Tier Audit Firms in the Post-Sox Period
Barriers to entry; Auditor switching; Second Tier audit firms; Market reaction
Research in Accounting Regulation
The US Government Accountability Office (GAO) studied concentration in the audit market and found that the Big 4 firms continue to dominate the market for clients with revenue of more than $500 million while non-Big 4 firms have gained market share among clients with revenue of $500 million or less (GAO, 2008). The US Treasury Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession has expressed concern about barriers to entry that might prevent a non-Big 4 firm from increasing its market share among large publicly-traded clients (Advisory Committee, 2008). One of these barriers may be the potential cost to shareholders if the stock market reacts negatively to the appointment of a non-Big 4 auditor (GAO, 2003). We examine whether the stock market reacts negatively when clients switch from a Big 4 to a non-Big 4, because a negative reaction might make such switching less likely to occur. We find that the market does not react more negatively when clients move from a Big 4 to a Second Tier auditing firm than when clients move from a Big 4 to another Big 4 firm. Our results suggest that a negative market reaction may not represent a significant barrier to entry among Second Tier auditing firms.
Recommended CitationCullinan, Charles P.; Du, Hui; and Zheng, Xiaochuan, "Barriers to Entry to the Big Firm Audit Market: Evidence From Market Reaction to Switches to Second Tier Audit Firms in the Post-Sox Period" (2012). Accounting Journal Articles. Paper 48.